Draft — needs reviewNot published. Every claim about the other product links to its source; re-check them before this page goes live.

Headlark vs writing SEO tags by hand

Checked 2026-10-20

In short: Libraries like astro-seo, next-seo and Next.js's Metadata API make it easy to render the tags, but you still write every title and description yourself and keep them current. Headlark writes them from each page's content on every build. For a handful of pages you care about word by word, write them by hand. For hundreds of pages, or content that changes often, Headlark saves the writing and the upkeep. They work together.

At a glance

HeadlarkBy hand (astro-seo, next-seo, Metadata API)
Who writes the textHeadlark, from the page's content, in its languageYou, for every page
Keeping it currentRewritten on the next build when a page's content changesManual
CostFree for 25 pages; paid plans from €39/monthFree; astro-seo and next-seo are MIT-licensed (npm, npm)
External servicePage HTML is sent to Headlark and its AI provider at build timeNone
ControlYour canonical, robots and JSON-LD types win; title and description are Headlark'sTotal

Where writing by hand is the better choice

Where Headlark is the better choice

Using both

Keep rendering canonical, robots and structured data from your code; Headlark keeps them. Let Headlark write titles, descriptions, link previews and missing alt text. See the Astro and Next.js guides.

Sources